WHAT IS LEARNING?
Learning, as it is defined in psychology and education, “is a process that brings together cognitive, emotional, and environmental influences and experiences for acquiring, enhancing, or making changes in one's knowledge, skills, values, and world views” (Illeris, 2000; Ormorod, 1995). Learning as a process focuses on what happens when the learning takes place. Explanations of what happens constitute learning theories.
WHAT IS A LEARNING THEORY?
Attempting to describe how we learn is what constitutes a learning theory. Therefore, it helps us understand the inherently complex process of learning.
Learning theories have two chief values according to Hill (2002). The first is in providing us with vocabulary and a conceptual framework for interpreting the examples of learning that we observe. The second is in suggesting where to look for solutions to practical problems. The theories do not give us solutions, but they do direct our attention to those variables that are crucial in finding solutions.

INTRODUCING LEARNING THEORIES
OVERVIEWS OF LEARNING THEORIES
According to Richard Culatta, Director of the Office of Educational Technology for the US Department of Education, 54 different learning theories exist.
However, there are three main categories or philosophical frameworks under which learning theories fall: behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism.
- Behaviourism focuses only on the objectively observable aspects of learning.
- Cognitive theories look beyond behaviour to explain brain-based learning.
- And constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts

Source : UC Berkeley - Berkeley Graduate Division
"Learning is always rebellion...
Every bit of new truth discovered is revolutionary to what was believed before."
Margaret Lee Runbec
Quotes
NEW LEARNING THEORIES
Social Learning
Reacting to the learning theories mentioned above and considering the latest technology evolution, digital media and the Internet, it’s necessary to re-evaluate learning theories.
The social learning theory of Bandura emphasizes the importance of observing and modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of others. Bandura (1977) states: "Learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do. Fortunately, most human behavior is learned observationally through modeling: from observing others one forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and on later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for action." (p22).
Social learning theory explains human behavior in terms of continuous reciprocal interaction between cognitive, behavioral, and environmental influences. The component processes underlying observational learning are:
-
Attention
Social Cognitive Theory implies that you must pay attention for you to learn. If you want to learn from the behavior of the model (the person that demonstrates the behavior), then you should eliminate anything that catches your attention other than him. Also, the more interesting the model is, the more likely you are to pay full attention to him and learn.
-
Retention
Retention of the newly learned behavior is necessary. Without it, learning of the behavior would not be established, and you might need to get back to observing the model again since you were not able to store information about the behavior.
-
Reproduction
When you are successful in paying attention and retaining relevant information, this step requires you to demonstrate the behavior. In this phase, practice of the behavior by repeatedly doing it is important for improvement.
-
Motivation
Feeling motivated to repeat the behavior is what you need in order to keep on performing it. This is where reinforcement and punishment come in. You can be rewarded by demonstrating the behavior properly, and punished by displaying it inappropriately.
Because it encompasses attention, memory and motivation, social learning theory spans both cognitive and behavioral frameworks. Bandura's theory improves upon the strictly behavioral interpretation of modeling provided by Miller & Dollard (1941). Bandura’s work is related to the theories of Vygotsky and Lave which also emphasize the central role of social learning.”
The learning theory for the digital age: Connectivism
According to the MNLI (Massachusetts New Literacies Institute), a new learning theory is being developed by George Siemans and Steven Downes, two Canadian educators. This new learning therory is Connectivism.
Connectivism is driven by the development of the Internet and digital media. Connectivism development as a concept is based on several observations of significant trends in learning that Siemans and Downes identified:
"Many learners will move into a variety of different,
possibly unrelated fields over the course of their lifetime."
Informal learning is a significant aspect of our learning experience. Formal education no longer comprises the majority of our learning. Learning now occurs in a variety of ways – through communities of practice, personal networks, and through completion of work-related tasks.
Learning is a continual process, lasting for a lifetime. Learning and work related activities are no longer separate. In many situations, they are the same.
Technology is altering (rewiring) our brains. The tools we use define and shape our thinking.
The organization and the individual are both learning organisms. Increased attention to knowledge management highlights the need for a theory that attempts to explain the link between individual and organizational learning.
Many of the processes previously handled by learning theories (especially in cognitive information processing) can now be off-loaded to, or supported by, technology.
Know-how and know-what is being supplemented with know-where (the understanding of where to find knowledge needed).
The learning theories of behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism assume that learning takes place inside people, but not the learning taking place outside of us. Connectivism is a learning theory that recognizes that in a networked world the way that information is created, distributed, processed, and evaluated plays a significant role in the learning process.
“Connectivism is the integration of principles explored by chaos,
network, and complexity and self-organization theories.
Learning is a process that occurs within nebulous environments
of shifting core elements – not entirely under the control of the individual.
Learning (defined as actionable knowledge) can reside outside of ourselves
(within an organization or a database),
is focused on connecting specialized information sets,
and the connections that enable us to learn more are more important
than our current state of knowing.”
(G. Siemans)
Nick Van Dams Next Learning Framework
In his 2011 book "Next Learning, unwrapped", Nick Van Dam published a new learning framework which has been developed and validated with many learning and development (L&D) professionals around the world and which has two components: learning in a formal context and learning in an informal context.
The figure below shows this new learning framework.
Experiential Learning
“As Stephen Brookfield (1983: 16) has commented, writers in the field of experiential learning have tended to use the term in two contrasting senses. On the one hand the term is used to describe the sort of learning undertaken by students who are given a chance to acquire and apply knowledge, skills and feelings in an immediate and relevant setting. Experiential learning thus involves a, ‘direct encounter with the phenomena being studied rather than merely thinking about the encounter, or only considering the possibility of doing something about it.’ (Borzak 1981: 9 quoted in Brookfield 1983). This sort of learning is sponsored by an institution and might be used on training programmes for professions such as social work and teaching or in field study programmes such as those for social administration or geography courses.
The second type of experiential learning is ‘education that occurs as a direct participation in the events of life’ (Houle 1980: 221). Here learning is not sponsored by some formal educational institution but by people themselves. It is learning that is achieved through reflection upon everyday experience and is the way that most of us do our learning.” (David A.Kolb)
Nick van Dam defines formal learning as "the structured, curriculum-driven, and role- or level-based learning that is formulated by an organization". In other words, it is "planned learning".
According to Van Dam, formal learning represents the traditional focus area of L&D managers, but this pattern of learning represents only 2% of how employees actually learn.
In the other hand, informal learning "can be defined as semistructured or unstructured learning that is driven by the daily L&D needs of employees, and occurs spontaneously on the job through problem solving, interaction with colleagues, and use of the Internet." Informal learning is considered the new era for L&D, especially when effective learning comes 98% from this pattern.
70:20:10
the 70:20:10 education model is a model for Learning and Development which is based on research and observation carried out from the 1960s until present.
Its basic hypothesis is:
Lessons learned by successful and effective managers are roughly:
-
70% through experience and practice
-
20% through other people, through conversations, through having networks, through knowing the right people to ask the right questions at the right time
-
10% occurs formally through lectures, training sessions, courses and reading (formal training)



REFERENCES
“Connectivism – a New Learning Theory | Massachusetts New Literacies Institute.” Accessed September 24, 2014. <http://mnli.org/2013/06/connectivism-a-new-learning-theory/>
“David A. Kolb on Experiential Learning.” Infed.org. Accessed October 16, 2014. <http://infed.org/mobi/david-a-kolb-on-experiential-learning/>
“Designing Learning for a 21st Century Workforce.” Accessed September 19, 2014. <http://www.astd.org/Publications/Magazines/TD/TD-Archive/2012/04/Designing-Learning-for-a-21St-Century-Workforce>
“Elearnspace. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age.” Accessed September 24, 2014. <http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm>
“Learning Frameworks.” 13:10:01 UTC. <http://fr.slideshare.net/nvandam/learning-frameworks>
“Learning Theory (education).” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, August 24, 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Learning_theory_(education)&oldid=621484621>
“Learning Theory (education).” Accessed September 11, 2014. <https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Learning_theory_(education).html>
“Learning Theory: Models, Product and Process.” Infed.org. Accessed September 11, 2014. <http://infed.org/mobi/learning-theory-models-product-and-process/>
“Make All Learning Experience Trackable | Classroom Aid.” Accessed October 2, 2014. <http://classroom-aid.com/2012/11/08/make-all-learning-experience-trackable/>
“What Is Social Learning Theory?” Accessed October 16, 2014. <https://explorable.com/social-learning-theory>
Van Dam, Nick. “Next Learning, Unwrapped,” n.d. <http://www.ie.edu/microsites/comunicacion/IE%20en%20Next%20Learning%20Unwrapped.pdf>